GHK-Cu Results
GHK-Cu results are mostly cosmetic (skin) and best tracked with a consistent photo log over weeks. Systemic use adds a copper-status consideration to monitor.
Why measurement beats a before/after photo
GHK-Cu skin results are gradual and easy to misjudge day to day. A consistent photo log (same lighting, same angle, dated) across weeks is the honest before/after. For systemic use, copper status is the one lab worth watching.
What to track on GHK-Cu
Texture, firmness, fine-line changes across weeks - the gradual cosmetic result.
Confirm copper does not accumulate with prolonged systemic use.
A simple 1-10 rating to pair with the photos.
GHK-Cu timeline: what tends to shift, when
Skin changes are gradual; photos will not show much yet - keep logging.
Cosmetic changes (texture, firmness) become visible in a consistent photo comparison.
A copper-status check on longer cycles confirms the one real systemic consideration.
Signal vs placebo: how to tell a real result
Skin results are the easiest to imagine and the hardest to judge from memory. The only reliable read is a dated photo log under identical conditions, compared across weeks - not day to day. For systemic GHK-Cu, the copper lab is the objective marker; skin is the visual one.
How to actually track GHK-Cu results
For topical GHK-Cu, a weekly same-conditions photo log plus a 1-10 skin rating is the whole before/after. For systemic use, add a serum-copper baseline and a re-check on longer cycles - copper accumulation is the one thing the mirror cannot show you.
Track GHK-Cu results with MyProtocolStack →